| United States Patent | 5,155,683 |
| Rahim | October 13, 1992 |
Vehicle remote guidance with
path control
Abstract
In a remotely piloted surface vehicle a television camera is used to send images to a screen on the operator's station. A computer displays the vehicle's intended path on the screen. The path appears as a computer-generated line superimposed on the image of the vehicle's environment, like a stripe painted on the ground. The operator can change or advance the path on the screen with a cursor control. A computer picks certain discrete screen points along the line and maps those screen positions onto ground positions called "waypoints". These are sent to the vehicle's guidance system to direct the vehicle along a path through the waypoints. The transform which maps the screen path onto the ground path depends on the camera orientation and lens. The transform parameters can be adjusted as the camera zooms, pans and tilts. Each time the screen is refreshed, the path line for that screen is calculated by the computer from the ground path, to present the ground path correctly in the new screen. The operator can extend or modify the path at will. The system is especially adapted to use in cases where a narrow bandwidth of the radio link between the camera and the station limits the screen refresh rate. The system maximizes the possible speed of the vehicle by presenting the path information in a format quickly grasped by the operator.
| Inventors: | Rahim; Wadiatur (201 Newberry Rd., Severna Park, MD 21146) |
| Appl. No.: | 683706 |
| Filed: | April 11, 1991 |
| Current U.S. Class: | 701/25; 180/168; 348/119; 701/28 |
| Intern'l Class: | G06F 015/50 |
| Field of Search: | 364/443,444,424.02,448 358/103 180/167,168,169 318/587 |
References Cited [Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
| 4405943 | Sep., 1983 | Kanaly | 358/103. |
| 4855822 | Aug., 1989 | Narendra et al. | 364/424. |
| 4926346 | May., 1990 | Yokoyama | 364/424. |
Primary Examiner: Chin; Gary
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Litman; Richard C.
Claims
I claim:
1. A control system for an operator to control a vehicle from a
remote station, said system comprising:
a camera on said vehicle for gathering image data;
means for sending said image data from said camera to said
station, said means for sending said image data including a radio
downlink from said vehicle to said station;
a screen at said station for displaying images from said camera,
for viewing by the operator;
means for generating a cursor and a screen path on said screen,
for viewing by the operator;
a cursor control for the operator to move said cursor on said
screen to determine placement of said screen path on said screen;
transform and waypoint generation means for geometrically
transforming said screen path into a planned ground path, for
determining waypoints along said planned ground path, and for
assigning waypoints coordinates to said waypoints;
a radio uplink from said station to said vehicle for sending said
waypoint coordinates to said vehicle;
a vehicle guidance system to guide said vehicle over an executed
ground path, said executed ground path including said waypoints,
said vehicle guidance system adapted to accept said waypoint
coordinates, said vehicle guidance system including a guidance
system memory for storing said waypoint coordinates, said vehicle
guidance system including vehicle servomechanisms to physically
control motions of said vehicle; and
means for reporting a frame position of said vehicle to said
transform and waypoint generation means over said downlink;
whereby
said screen will display an image of said vehicle environment
taken by said camera at said frame position, the operator will
trace out said screen path with said cursor control, and said
vehicle will following said corresponding ground path
automatically.
2. The control system as in claim 1, wherein said means for
reporting said frame position of said vehicle includes
a navigation system for maintaining a current vehicle position
relative to said waypoints, said navigation system including
sensors for detecting position, motion or orientation of said
vehicle, or conditions of said vehicle environment.
3. The vehicle as in claim 2 wherein said navigation system
reports said current vehicle position to said guidance system,
for vehicle feedback to said guidance system.
4. The control system as in claim 1, wherein
said means for sending image data includes an image buffer for
storing said image data of one frame from said camera while said
downlink transmits said data to said station, and
said screen includes a display buffer for maintaining said one
frame stationary on said screen, whereby
the operator will continuously view a still picture taken by said
camera in the past.
5. The control system as in claim 1, wherein
said control system includes command generation means for the
operator to generate commands, and wherein
said uplink transmits said commands to said guidance system for
controlling said vehicle.
6. The control system as in claim 5, including a mount connecting
said camera to said vehicle, said mount including camera motion
means for moving said camera relative to said vehicle, said
camera motion means including mount servomechanisms;
wherein said commands include camera motion commands;
wherein said uplink transmits said camera motion commands to said
camera motion means; and
wherein said transform and waypoint generation means obtains
information on camera position from said downlink for
transforming said screen path into a planned ground path
according to said camera position; whereby
said camera will pan, tilt, or translate at said commands from
the operator and said control system will function properly.
7. The control system as in claim 6, including means for
automatically controlling said camera position whereby
said means for automatically controlling contains means for
comparing said waypoints transmitted by said transform and
waypoint generation means with said frame position of said
vehicle.
8. The control system as in claim 6, wherein said camera includes
a variable-focal-length zoom lens and zoom control
servomechanism, said camera motion commands include zoom
commands, and wherein said transform and waypoint generation
means obtains information on camera lens focal length from said
zoom control servomechanisms for transforming said screen path
into a planned ground path according to said focal length;
whereby
said camera lens will zoom at the command of the operator and
said control system will function properly.
9. The control system as in claim 8, including means for
automatically controlling said camera position whereby
said means for automatically controlling contains means for
comparing said waypoints transmitted by said transform and
waypoint generation means with said frame position of said
vehicle.
10. The control system as in claim 1, wherein said transform and
waypoint generation means includes means for automatically
determining said waypoints.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to remote control systems for
unmanned surface vehicles which are guided by an operator, in
systems where the operator can see the vehicle environment by a
television link.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PRIOR ART
Remote vehicle guidance has many areas of possible application.
An operator riding within the vehicle may be impractical if the
vehicle is small or underpowered. A vehicle operator may also be
endangered in poisonous environments or in military vehicles
during a battle.
A system for remote control must transmit commands from the
operator's station to the vehicle, and the operator also needs
feedback from the vehicle. The typical way to feed back
information to the operator is through a video link from a
television camera on the vehicle. Television cameras are now
small and rugged enough for almost any application. It might be
expected that an operator sitting at a remote station could
control a remote vehicle as well by watching the environment
through a high-resolution TV screen as by sitting in the vehicle
and looking through a window. Unfortunately, however, the
usefulness of remotely controlled vehicles is often limited by
poor image feedback to the operator. This is because radio links
are the only practical way to send back the images from the TV
camera on the vehicle to the operator's station, in most cases.
Television, or any other system which transmits images, requires
a large radio bandwidth because information is transmitted at a
high rate. Images which are sent in real time, and which have
reasonable resolution, may require a megahertz or more of
bandwidth. Clearly, finding a place in the radio spectrum for the
video link can be hard. In the case of military vehicles, there
could be hundreds or even thousands of vehicles all operating at
once during a battle, each needing its own uncluttered band.
Single-sideband radio, data compression techniques, and computer
image enhancement can help somewhat. Special techniques like
fiber-optic tethers and laser or microwave links could entirely
solve the bandwidth problem, but they are impractical for other
reasons. Tethers are obviously limited by length, fragility, and
fouling. Infrared, visible and microwave links can only be used
as line-of-sight beams, which must be accurately aimed at the
moving vehicle and which are cut off by intervening objects,
including the horizon. For radio links of ordinary frequencies
and ranges, the fundamental constraints imposed by the
mathematics of Fourier's Theorem and information theory often
will mean that the images coming to the operator are either very
grainy, or alternatively, that they can only be refreshed at
intervals greater than the persistence time of the eye (about a
twentieth of a second) and so will flicker or appear as a series
of still images. Image resolution and refresh rate can be traded
off against one another, but the graininess of the image cannot
be arbitrarily increased; so with limited bandwidth, the refresh
rate will be slowed.
(Even if the refresh rate is of the order of a minute, useful
information will be presented at intervals; but if the grain is
too coarse, objects will not be seen and the operator will end up
colliding the vehicle with some obstacle.)
Once the screen refresh rate drops to the point where a second or
more is elapsing between frames, driving the remote vehicle
becomes very difficult. The operator will tend to react to a
screen as if it is in real time, that is, as if the vehicle were
at the ground position from which the screen image is taken; but
the vehicle is elsewhere by the time the operator views the image.
A delay is introduced into the feedback loop which sends the
operator's commands to the vehicle and the camera's information
to the operator. If the operator is under stress or must quickly
make many decisions, as in a battle, he or she is likely to
control the vehicle badly--even if trained to take the delay into
account. As the delay becomes longer, the problem is aggravated.
The prior art has dealt with this problem in various ways. One
approach is to limit high resolution to only a portion of the
viewing screen; this portion is picked by the operator to view an
area of interest. The area of interest appears in focus,
surrounded by blurred area. This approach is discussed by Kanaly
in U.S. Pat. No. 4,405,943. The loss of information with this
system is obvious. Complication and operator confusion are
introduced by the requirement of picking an area, and the extra
hardware and/or software required.
Graham, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,682,225, discloses an other system.
Graham discusses image compression, which involves sampling the
data stream from the camera at intervals and transmitting only
the sampled data. The resulting screen image is blurred. If the
camera is almost stationary, image clarity can be improved by
superimposing the blurred images of the sampled data. (The human
eye will itself do this over intervals less than a second.)
Basically, this system trades off clarity or detail in favor of
an appearance of continuous "real time" motion on the
screen. The same bandwidth which could transmit high resolution
screens at intervals instead transmits a multitude of blurred
screens. If the camera is panned, zoomed, or jiggled, the
technique is totally ineffective. Also, if the superposition is
by hardware or software rather than in the eye, cost and
complexity are involved.
Hinman, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,661,849, discusses interpolation
between discrete screen images or frames by computer simulation.
This presents an appearance of smooth motion to the viewer. Such
a system is costly in computer hardware and software running
time, and may mislead the operator by presenting an impression of
real time events which are fictitious projections instead of the
real environment.
Narendra et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 4,855,822) also employs a computer
to generate interpolated image between the discrete images sent
by the camera, so as to present an impression of continuous
motion of the operator. Their interpolations are determined by
the motion of the vehicle. Narendra et al. also disclose the idea
of superimposing an image of the vehicle on the screen.
Conventional bandwidth compression techniques are used by
Narendra et al.
The Jet Propulsion Laboratory has developed a system called
Computer Aided Remote Driving (CARD). The CARD system is
described in a paper, "Computer-Aided Remote Driving",
presented at the 13th annual meeting of the Association for
Unmanned Vehicle Systems in Boston, MA on Jul. 21-23, 1986. The
paper is authored by Brian H. Wilcox, Robert Salo, Brian Cooper,
and Richard Killon, Technical Group Supervisor at the Jet
Propulsion Laboratory of California Institute of Technology in
Pasadena, CA.
CARD is intended for interplanetary remote control of
vehicles and military applications. In remotely driving a
vehicle on another planet, narrow bandwidths data restrictions
are compounded by message delays due to the finite speed of radio
beams. Vehicle speed is not crucial on another planet, but may be
in a military application.
The CARD system uses two high-resolution cameras to generate a
stereo image for the operator. The operator views both images at
once, one through either eye, to see the vehicle environment in
three dimensions. The viewing system has two screens with
relatively crossed Polaroid filters, two half-silvered mirrors to
superimpose the images, and Polaroid glasses worn by the operator
to isolate the two images. Three-dimensional viewing may be
helpful when the operator is viewing an extraterrestrial
environment, and is less able to extrapolate distances from
unfamiliar objects.
The CARD operator at the control station sends a signal to the
vehicle to transmit the stereo images, and waits for all the data
for both screens to arrive at the station and to appear in the
stereo viewer. Then the operator uses a three-dimensional control
to denote points in the space seen in the viewer. (A three-dimensional
control is one with three degrees of freedom; CARD uses a
joystick with a rotatable knob.) The control drives a cursor
which is superimposed on the picture which the operator sees, and
which appears to move about in space in response to the
operator's motion of the three-dimensional control.
A computer at the station takes the three dimensions of joystick
motion and turns them into Cartesian space coordinates x, y, z at
the vehicle location; it then transforms those coordinates into
individual screen positions for the two viewing screens, so that
the operator sees the cursor located in space in the stereo image.
The transform from space coordinates to screen coordinates can
easily be programmed from the geometry.
The operator, by depressing a button, can denote any cursor
position as a waypoint. He or she denotes a series of waypoints
to define points of a path in the space seen in the viewer, over
which the operator wants the vehicle to travel. When all the
waypoints are denoted, the operator pushes the "go"
button. The station computer then takes the control readings
recorded from the waypoints, transforms them into the appropriate
commands (vehicle angles, segment lengths, compass headings), and
relays these commands to the vehicle. The received commands tell
the vehicle's guidance system how to proceed. The vehicle
automatically responds to the commands by moving to the next
waypoint; eventually it reaches the final point. It then begins
the process over by sending two more images.
Neither the station computer nor the on-board computer calculates
any curve from the waypoints: the vehicle moves straight to the
next point, turns abruptly, and then goes on to the next. The
station computer interrogates the vehicle's on-board computer
about the vehicle's heading after each leg of the path is
traversed, and instructs the vehicle for the next leg of the path.
CARD avoids the feedback problem by eliminating any semblance of
real-time driving, and instead presenting the operator with a
static problem: given a picture, chart a path through it.
Operator confusion is eliminated, but at the cost of dead-time in
the control cycle. The operator must wait while the vehicle
laboriously goes through all of the waypoints, takes a picture,
and transmits the image over the slow radio.
Being sluggish, CARD is not adapted to any use in which the
operator should react quickly to changes in the vehicle
environment, such as military use. CARD also has the drawback
that it effectively halves the bandwidth of the radio link by
presenting two stereo images, instead of only one. Moreover, the
resolution needed for each of the combined stereo images is
substantially greater than the resolution needed for a single
monoscopic image of equal clarity. This is because higher
resolution is needed to locate objects in the depth dimension
when the images are combined. This need further decreases the
effective bandwidth.
CARD uses conventional data compression techniques to decrease
the bandwidth by about a factor of four. Such techniques are too
slow for real time video, but are effective with slower
transmission.
The CARD prototype described in the paper uses solid-state
cameras 0.5 m apart. The cameras have a grain of 320 pixels per
horizontal line, giving a 1-pixel stereo offset for objects at a
range of 300 m. The vehicle includes a magnetic compass and
odometer for dead reckoning calculation of vehicle position by
the small on-board computer.
None of the above inventions and patents, taken either singly or
in combination, is seen to describe the instant invention as
claimed.
The prior art does not disclose any system for driving a vehicle
by remote imaging under low screen refresh rates which is adapted
to real-time driving; which is easy and natural for an operator
to use; which is simple and reliable; which is inexpensive; and
which allows the operator to react in the least possible time.
Accordingly, one object of the present invention is a vehicle
remote imaging control system which does not confuse the operator
with time delays in the control loop.
Another object is a system which is as simple as possible given
the constraints of slow image data transfer, so as to be reliable
and inexpensive.
A further object is a system with minimal computer hardware and
software requirements.
An additional object is a system which allows a vehicle to
proceed at the utmost speed.
A final object is a system which uses only available, proven
technology.
These and other objects of the present invention will become
readily apparent upon further review of the following
specification and drawings.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In a remotely piloted surface vehicle, where a television camera
on the vehicle is used to send images to a screen at a vehicle
operator's station, the present invention comprises an improved
and simplified system for remote driving. The system is
especially adapted to slow video data transfer rate situations,
where real-time video is unavailable and the operator can see
only discrete "snapshot" image frames on the screen.
The vehicle's intended path is displayed on the operator's
viewing screen. The path appears as a computer-generated line
superimposed on the image of the vehicle's environment, appearing
like a stripe painted on the ground. A screen cursor appears at
the end of the line. The operator can change or advance the path
line on the screen with a cursor control device, which might be a
joystick, mouse, steering wheel and pedals, or any other control
having two degrees of freedom.
As the line is extended by the operator, the computer picks
certain discrete screen points along the line extension. The
computer then maps these points onto ground positions in the
vehicle environment by a mathematical transform. The ground
positions are called "waypoints". These are sent to the
vehicle's guidance system to direct the vehicle along a path
through the waypoints. The guidance system has a memory which
stores the waypoints and directs the vehicle successively over
them.
The transform which maps the screen path onto the ground path
uses simple trigonometric formulas and perhaps coordinate
transformations. The transform and parameters depend on the
camera orientation and lens. The transform parameters can be
continuously adjusted if the camera zooms, pans or tilts.
In the usual low video data rate situation, the operator will see
a sequence of still frames or "snapshots". A few frame
will replace the old automatically at intervals determined by the
data rate and the screen resolution.
The vehicle's computer includes an image buffer to store data
from a instantaneous view of the camera. This data is sent to the
station. Once all the data are arrived, that frame is
automatically displayed on the operator's screen. The operator
sees a frame taken some time ago.
For each new screen the path line is recalculated from the
reported position of the vehicle relative to the ground points.
The recalculated path line is then superimposed on the screen so
as again to appear to lie on the surface, and the operator can
quickly perceive the new situation of the vehicle and correct the
projected path.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an operator controlling the radio
message from a computer.
FIG. 2 a perspective view of the controlled vehicle, showing
obstacles, a trapezoidal area seen by the camera on the vehicle,
and waypoints on the ground.
FIG. 3 is a schematic elevation view showing a screen path and
rectangular coordinates on the screen.
FIG. 4 is a schematic plan view showing the rectangular
coordinates and screen path of FIG. 3 transformed into ground
coordinates and waypoints on the ground.
FIG. 5 is a perspective view of the vehicle.
FIG. 6 is a schematic showing the flow of vehicle control
information through the system.
FIG. 7 is a schematic showing the flow of camera control
information through the system where the camera is movable
relative to the vehicle body.
Similar reference characters denote corresponding features
consistently throughout the attached drawings.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Some definitions of terms, used in the following Description and
Claims, are:
"Camera" means film camera, infrared TV, radar, imaging
sonar, or any other imaging apparatus whatsoever, as well as the
typical visible light scanning television camera.
"Computer" means a digital computer, analog computer,
hard-wired logic circuits, or any calculating device with memory.
"Cursor" means any visible, movable highlight, emblem,
outline shape, etc. which can denote a position or area on a
screen, and which can move in at least two dimensions. The cursor
may include means for denoting direction as well as position,
particularly by its shape. Typically, the cursor will be a
flashing highlight on a CRT screen. The cursor may be shaped as a
point, an arrow, an outline of the vehicle as seen in perspective
at the cursor location, or any other shape.
"Downlink" refers to radio transmission of information
from the vehicle to the station.
"Frame" means a single static view or image which fills
the screen.
"Ground" means a surface over which the vehicle moves,
be it concrete, carpeting, water, or any other surface. The
invention is not limited to land vehicles traveling over earth.
"Radio" means communication by waves, such as
electromagnetic waves. Sonar is one possible such wave.
"Screen" means any viewing device which appears to be
flat or two-dimensional to the operator or viewer (as opposed to
stereoscopic). Ordinarily the screen of the present invention
will physically be a surface, such as the glass surface of a CRT.
A liquid crystal screen, or any other surface capable of
displaying a path and some image corresponding to the vehicle
environment, may be used. Emblems or icons whose positions
correspond to those of objects or conditions near the vehicle may
be used instead of, or in addition to, regular transmitted
pictures. The definition does not exclude monocular viewers such
as helmet-mounted devices, or viewing goggles with individual
lens systems presenting the same image, which do not incorporate
a physical surface for viewing. Enhanced images are also within
the scope of the invention.
"Uplink" refers to radio transmission of information
from the station to the vehicle.
"Vehicle" means any device adapted to travel on or
above a ground surface, having means to power the device to move
and having means for controlling the motions.
"Waypoint" means a ground position referable to the
coordinates of the vehicle guidance system or steering geometry.
A waypoint may also be a position combined with a heading and/or
a speed. It may also be any time derivative of position, such as
acceleration. In general, it is a datum or data set to which
vehicle position is referable. A waypoint may include elevation
as well as ground position.
The present invention, as seen in FIGS. 1 and 2, is a system for
presenting future vehicle path information to the operator O (FIG.
1) of a remotely controlled vehicle V (FIG. 2), where the vehicle
V sends images back to the operator's station S from a camera 30
mounted on the vehicle V. It employs a station computer 16 to
superimpose on a station screen 14 a screen path line 12 showing
the intended future path of the vehicle V over the surface. The
operator O takes the line 12 to lie on the ground surface, like a
painted stripe on a highway; the system is designed for this
operator perception, and includes software to generate a
projected ground path as a line on screen.
Radios 24 at on the vehicle V and at the station S send data back
and forth.
The operator O, seen at the control station in FIG. 1, uses a
cursor control joystick 10 to extend or modify the screen path
line 12 as seen on the screen 14. The operator O traces out an
apparent path for the vehicle V with the aid of a cursor 18 which
is superimposed on the viewing image at the end of the line 12.
The operator O can move the cursor 18 about at will with the
joystick 10.
The line 12 must be transformed into a planned ground surface
path by a simple computer program, which maps the position of any
point on the screen 14 into a corresponding ground point on the
ground traversed by the vehicle V. The mapping transform will
ordinarily map the rectangle of the screen onto the trapezoid on
the ground which is seen by the camera 30, as shown in FIG. 2.
The mapping program parameters will depend upon the altitude,
attitude, and focal length of the camera lens 36.
The transform idea is illustrated schematically in FIGS. 3 and 4.
FIG. 3 shows the viewing screen of FIG. 1, but no camera image of
the vehicle environment is shown: instead is shown a rectangular
grid corresponding to a possible system of screen coordinates. (This
grid is not a physical image seen by the operator O, but is
rather a mathematical projection to explain the transform.) A
screen path is also shown, in the form of a line 12. The screen
path ends with a cursor 18 in the shape of an arrow. FIG. 4 is a
bird's eye or plan view of the ground in front of the vehicle V,
showing the rectangular grid of FIG. 3 transformed into a
trapezoidal grid. The screen path of FIG. 3 has been transformed
into discrete "waypoints", labeled 20, which outline
the planned ground path of the vehicle; the generation of the
waypoints 20 is explained below. Both the grid lines and
waypoints of FIG. 4 are, like the grid of FIG. 3, non-physical.
The transform is performed by a computer or computers at the
station. This function is illustrated by the box labeled
coordinate transform and waypoint generator" in Schematic
FIG. 6. FIG. 6 shows the flow of information in the present
invention: arrows represent information, and boxes are devices
and/or processes such as computer algorithms. The reader will
find reference to FIG. 6 helpful in the following discussion.
It is possible for the operator's cursor control to directly
generate planned ground coordinates. The computer would in this
case transform those coordinates back to screen coordinates for
screen 14 display. The essential thing is that the operator work
in the view of the screen and that the screen path be correctly
transformed into a planned ground path.
Usually the transform will require only trigonometry. If an
unusual camera lens 36 is used, for example a fisheye lens, more
complex coordinate transformations will be needed. In any case,
the formulas of transformation are simple, straightforward, and
easy for one skilled in the art to implement.
The control joystick 10 shown in FIG. 1 is well adapted to a
simple point cursor 18. Other controls might be adapted to other
sorts of cursors. For example, if an angle control such as a
steering wheel is used, the cursor 18 might be in the shape of an
arrow, whose angle corresponds to the angle of the steering wheel.
The joystick 10 of FIG. 1 can include a rotatable knob for angle.
The cursor 18 may also be made large and shaped like the outline
of the vehicle V. This form of cursor 18 is illustrated in FIG. 1.
The operator O may then guide the cursor 18 outline through
narrow gaps as shown in FIG. 1, and avoid a path if the outline
will not fit through. In this case there could be two screen path
lines 12 instead of the one illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 3, each
one line trailing from a respective outer edge of the vehicle
outline cursor 18. The outline should be displayed in
perspective, so as to appear on the screen image of the ground as
would a shadow of the vehicle V cast by a sun directly overhead.
The size and shape of the outline can easily be calculated for
the display. Such an outline is easily programmed by one skilled
in the art. The outline of the vehicle V may also be simplified
to a rectangle or bar indicating the width of the vehicle V.
Preferably, the cursor 18 sweeps out the line 12 on the screen,
just as a marker leaves a line on paper, to denote the screen
path. As an alternative, the cursor 18 might be used to set the
screen positions of the individual ground waypoints 20 through
which the vehicle V would pass, like dots on paper. The screen
points could be clicked on with a button and appear on the screen
as dots or cursor shapes. The computer 16 would then transform
the coordinates of the screen path points into ground waypoint
coordinates for radio uplink transmission to the vehicle's
guidance system. However, operator choice of waypoints 20 puts an
extra workload on the operator, so the waypoint choice is best
left to the station computer, which can pick waypoints 20 without
inordinate hardware and software requirements.
If the path line 12 is continuous, the station computer 16 will
pick ground waypoints 20 based on some decision algorithm which
keeps the waypoints 20 spaced closely enough to track the vehicle
V. The infinity of points defining a continous line cannot be
transmitted to the vehicle V, and is not needed. The guidance
system of the vehicle can regenerate a planned ground path
through the waypoints 20 and then follow that path. The required
spacing of the transmitted waypoints 20 will depend upon the
sophistication of the path regeneration program of the vehicle's
guidance system.
The coordinate transform and waypoint generation computer may
display the screen path swept out by the cursor 18 as a line 12,
or, may generate multiple images on the screen, located at the
waypoint or elsewhere. Any display which informs the operator O
of the screen path of the vehicle is within the scope of the
present invention.
Since it may be necessary to readjust the projected path of the
vehicle in the face of emergencies or miscalculations, the cursor
control should have the capability of erasing the end of the
screen path, that is, "back-tracking". It may be
helpful to have a separate cursor reverse control which would
erase the screen path line 12 from the end of the line back
toward the vehicle.
The vehicle guidance system, which receives the waypoint
coordinates from the station's transform and waypoint generation
computer by way of the radio uplink, must include a guidance
system computer 26 as seen in FIG. 1, or equivalent hard-wired
circuitry, which has a memory. The memory stores the coordinates
of the projected waypoints 20, which define a ground path for the
vehicle V. This allows the operator O to set a planned ground
path for the vehicle V to follow while the next frame is being
transmitted. The guidance memory is an essential element of the
present invention, as it allows driving in the future time of the
instant of the snapshot frame, and avoids feedback loop trouble.
Because the waypoints 20 need to be erased when the path is
changed, the guidance system computer memory may conveniently be
of the last-in, first-out stack type.
The guidance system may of any type which allows the vehicle V to
automatically steer through the waypoints 20. The vehicle may
rely on dead reckoning to guide it on its path along the
waypoints. Any method of tracking distance and direction, such
odometers, integrating accelerometers, compasses, gyroscopes, or
other conventional guidance means are feasible.
The guidance system need not receive operator commands directed
toward the motion parameters of the vehicle V, such as vehicle
speed and steering wheels angle. The transmitted waypoints 20 are
sufficient to track the vehicle V and control its speed (although
direct speed control may be advantageous in some cases, and is
not outside the scope of the invention). The more sophisticated
the guidance program, the less need there will be for commands
additional to the waypoint coordinates.
The guidance computer accepts the waypoint coordinates from the
radio uplink as input, and outputs signals directly to the
vehicle servomechanisms which control the motor, brakes and
steering of the vehicle V. (Motor, etc. are listed as examples.
Any sort of physical controls, depending on the particular type
of vehicle, may be part of the invention. In this Description and
in the following Claims, "vehicle servomechanism" means
any means for physically controlling a vehicle according to
signals from the guidance system.)
The physical motions of the vehicle V in response to the guidance
system signals will not ordinarily be completely predictable.
Wheel slip, steering gear backlash, or water or air currents (in
the cases of vehicles which are boats or planes), will all throw
off the intended path. In other words, the planned ground path
and the executed ground path may differ. For this reason, the
vehicle will ordinarily include a navigation system consisting of
sensors and means for reporting the vehicle's attitude, speed,
etc. to the vehicle guidance system and to the operator's station
computer.
The sensors may be odometers, magnetic compasses, accelerometers
with position integrators, speedometers, gyrocompasses, satellite
position sensors, or any other means of detecting the position,
attitude, or state of the vehicle V.
(The guidance system may act upon the input of non-navigational
sensors as well. Such sensors would detect vehicle environmental
conditions or dangers, such as mines, quicksand, etc. Such a
sensor 22 is shown in FIG. 5.)
The feedback of the navigation system to the guidance system is
optional in cases where the vehicle motion is predictable from
the signals sent to the vehicle servomechanisms. However, the
feedback of the vehicle V position to the station computer is not
optional, because the vehicle position at the time of the frame
snapshot must be known to the station computer's screen path
generator if the screen path is to be correctly displayed on the
screen 14. Therefore a device to maintain and report the
vehicle's current position at any time is an essential element of
the present invention. The navigation system with its sensors may
be omitted if dead reckoning calculations in the guidance system
are relied upon to maintain a current vehicle position, and the
guidance system has means for reporting the position at the time
of a snapshot to the station.
The projected path of the vehicle V extends from the vehicle
position where the most recent frame was taken by the camera;
this is the reference point for all calculations and motions. The
path will extend up to the last waypoint 20 transmitted by the
operator O. The guidance system need not stop or slow the vehicle
V until it nears the last waypoint 20 in the path.
The vehicle, when it transmits a frame, will also transmit a
report on its position at the time of the "snapshot".
This frame position will be referenced to the waypoints. The
current vehicle position, as discussed above, is maintained by
the navigation system or guidance system.
Each time the screen is refreshed with a new frame, a new screen
path line 12 for that frame is calculated by the computer of the
screen path generator. Input for the calculation is the vehicle's
reported frame position and the stored waypoint positions; output
is the placement of the line 12 on the screen. The line 12 is
constructed from the waypoints by an algorithm which operates
inversely to the algorithm which picks the waypoints from the
line.
The position of the vehicle V at the time the frame is taken will
generally be intermediate between waypoints. The intermediate
position may be referenced in various ways: the coordinate origin
may be shifted to the last-passed waypoint; the position may be
specified as a path distance from the last waypoint, and the path
reconstructed by a station computer according to the same
algorithm which the guidance system computer uses to generate the
ground path from the waypoints; or some other methods may be used.
It should be noted that the screen path is referenced to both the
ground position of the vehicle at some instant and the frame
snapshot taken at the same instant. Even if the executed ground
path has drifted away from the planned ground path, and the
navigation system has not corrected the error, the screen path,
the image of the frame, and the ground path are all kept
synchronized by being reset to the same position and orientation
with each new frame. There is no accumulated drift to invalidate
the operator's commands. Thus both direction and distance sensors
may be simple, relatively low-accuracy types, as they are
constantly "recalibrated".
Because the operator O is using the cursor control to pick the
vehicle's future path, and not its present actions, there is no
feedback lag to throw the operator's reactions off.
Ordinarily, the TV camera 30 will be a visible light camera with
a low-distortion lens 36. The operator's screen 14 will then
present an image similar to that which he or she would see
through a window on the vehicle. As discussed above, the
coordinate transform of the screen path to the planned ground
path maps the line 12 into waypoints 20 on the ground. The ground
trapezoid is the transformed shape of the rectangular screen 14.
(A low-distortion lens maps a ground trapezoid onto its
rectangular film plane.)
If the camera is tilted to roughly horizontal, the horizon will
be in the picture, and the trapezoid will extend to infinity. The
portion of the frame above the horizon will be outside the range
of the mapping transform.
Partial simulations, such as enhanced images resulting from
calculations between adjacent pixels, are within the scope of the
present invention. Images which are transformed to overcome lens
distortion or to present a rotated, expanded, or intentionally
distorted image to aid operator comprehension, are also within
the scope of the present invention, as are added or enhanced
portions of the screen image (for example, target sights or
flashing highlights) and inset or superimposed images to denote
objects identified by auxiliary systems.
Images which are generated as time projections or predictions
from data received, or which are interpolations of discrete
screen views separated in time, are not within the scope of the
present invention.
In the present invention, the operator O is presented with a
"snapshot" still frame of the ground terrain whenever
the screen is refreshed. This is accomplished by video data
storage in a two buffers.
The camera 30 will typically be a horizontal-sweep, top-to-bottom
scan TV. The camera 30 will scan once in a short time, to "snap"
a picture or frame, and send the image data to an image buffer in
one of the vehicle's on-board computers for storage. The stored
data represents one complete frame. This video data is
sequentially retrieved from the image buffer and sent over the
radio downlink to the station, where the video data is again
stored in a display buffer of the station computer memory as it
comes in. Once all the data for a complete frame has arrived, the
stored frame is displayed on the station screen 14 continuously
until the data for the next complete frame has arrived. The
operator O thus sees a still picture frame taken from the
position of the vehicle V at an instant in the past, which
remains on the screen until the next frame is ready for display.
The time between the snapshot and display is nearly equal to the
time required to transmit the video data over the radio downlink,
because the downlink sends only the vehicle position in addition
to the video data, and the transmission time is very small. If
transceiver radios 24 are used, the uplink time must be included
in the complete frame cycle of radio transmission, but this also
requires only a brief interval compared to the time needed to
transmit the great amount of video data. This is the preferred
method, because only one radio band is needed for each vehicle;
the total bandwidth for a set of vehicles is halved.
(The system of the present invention is also adapted to wide-band
burst transmission, in which each vehicle uses the same radio
frequency in turn. In this case the image can be sent as it is
scanned, and no storage buffer is needed on the vehicle. A
display buffer is still needed at the station if the time between
frames is greater than the persistence time of the eye, that is,
about a twentieth of a second.)
In some cases the camera 30 should have the ability to tilt, pan
and zoom in response to operator commands. It may also be
necessary to move the camera 30 from place to place on the
vehicle V, or extend it on a boom. If this capability exists, the
parameters of the coordinate transforms from the line 12 to the
ground waypoints 20 will change as the camera moves and changes
its focal length. These changes must be reported to the station
computer for generating the screen path and the waypoints. The
camera position will not automatically "reset" as will
the vehicle position. The camera must be kept in reference to the
vehicle body for the present invention to work.
Camera motion relative to the vehicle V requires a camera mount
32, shown in FIG. 5. The mount 32 will have servomechanisms 34,
may include sensors for detecting the position of the camera 30.
In FIG. 5, the sensors are incorporated into the servos 34. FIG.
5 shows a mount having tilt, pan, and transverse translation
mechanisms. These are illustrative only: mounts allowing any sort
of motion are within the scope of the present invention. FIG. 5
also shows a zoom servomechanism and sensor 34 mounted on the
lens 36.
A schematic of a camera control system is shown in FIG. 7. If the
camera controls are positive, such as by step motors, the station
computer can keep track of the camera position by integrating all
the camera commands as time goes by, and calculating the
transform parameters at the same time; in this case the control
will follow the solid arrow lines of FIG. 7. If on the other hand
the camera controls are of the type which can drift, such as belt
drives, then the camera mount must include sensors and means to
report the attitude and focal length of the camera and lens. The
extra information flow for this case is shown by the dashed lines
in FIG. 7. The station computers cannot know the the dashed lines
in FIG. 7. The station computers cannot know the position of the
camera by integrating past commands sent over the uplink, and so
must receive reports from the camera sensors by way of the
downlink.
The camera may be controlled by operator commands over the uplink.
The camera may also be controlled automatically, that is, by a
computer. Either the guidance system computer on board the
vehicle, or a station computer, may direct the camera motions. If
the guidance system controls the camera, then feedback
information on camera position which is needed at the station may
be sent either from camera mount sensors, or else by relaying the
guidance system's camera commands, over the downlink to the
station. If camera control originates at the station, then
feedback on camera position from the vehicle may be needed.
The present invention is intended primarily for ground surfaces
which are two dimensional, but it also adaptable to piloting
vehicles which move in three-dimensional space above a surface,
for example, drone airplanes and shallow-water submarines.
Vehicles like these are not conceptually different from ground
vehicles in which the camera is elevated to various heights on a
boom or telescoping mast. Such space-traversing vehicles must
include an altitude sensor, whose output is downlinked to the
station computer to be used as a screen/ground transform
parameter.
Two-dimensional surfaces are rarely flat. If the navigation
sensors include inclinometers, and the guidance system of the
vehicle has a program adapted to dealing with hills and ravines,
the vehicle will guide itself more accurately. Such a program may
account for foreshortening of the path as laid out on the screen,
as for example, by multiplying odometer readings by the cosine of
the slope to obtain the horizontal distance traveled when the
waypoint generator has assumed level ground. A more sophisticated
program might allow the operator O to break the path into
discontinuous segments, for use when a portion of the ground is
invisible on the screen, as at the crest of a hill.
As can be seen in FIG. 6, the present invention incorporates
three basic feedback loops whose names are centered inside the
respective loops: the operator loop wherein the operator O
determines the path; the vehicle loop wherein the vehicle V is
guided according to waypoints and commands transmitted over the
uplink; and the system loop which is incorporates the radio links.
The vehicle loop is not an essential element of the present
invention, as the navigation system is optional. The other two
loops are essential.
The discussion above outlines the preferred embodiment of the
present invention, which allows the maximum vehicle speed
possible given still picture frames. Video data storage in a
storage buffer in the on-board computer is necessary in this
embodiment. There is another embodiment which is within the scope
of the invention, when used with continuous transmission on a
narrow radio link (as opposed to burst transmission).
In this second embodiment the camera scans continuously and the
data is sent continuously to the operator's station. The display
buffer and the station computer are adapted to present a screen
with two frames intermixed; the border between the two views
scans down and a single frame would appear only at the beginning
(or end) of a sweep. Real-time images are just above the
horizontal border line; time delay increases with distance upward
from the border to the top of the screen, and then increases yet
more as the view "wraps around" to the bottom: the
image just below the border is that part farthest in the past.
This method of image transmission is the closest to realtime that
is possible with a slow radio link (one part of the image is
always in real time.) However, distortion will be introduced into
the views by this method, since the vehicle is moving while the
TV camera scans. As a result, circular objects would appear egg-shaped.
However, since scanned frames present the most up-to-date
information possible, some distortion might be tolerable; or, the
display screen or the station computer could compensate for the
distortion.
This second embodiment also requires adjustment of the vehicle
computer guidance system's reporting of the vehicle position.
Some particular time must be designated for position references.
Also, the programs used to calculate the screen path/ground path
transforms would need to be modified.
In the present invention, the various components discussed above
may be replaced by functional equivalents which are within the
scope of the present invention according to the definitions above.
It is to be understood that the present invention is not limited
to the sole embodiment described above, but encompasses any and
all embodiments within the scope of the following claims.
* * * * *